OPINION • 2026-02-09

News Corp's $1 Billion Buyback Bonanza: Excluding Aussies and Roasting the Murdoch Empire's Latest Cash Hoard Trick

In a move that's equal parts corporate housekeeping and eyebrow-raising exclusion, News Corp announces a $1 billion share repurchase program for its U.S. stocks, snubbing ASX-listed interests. We dive into the salty details of this capital return strategy, questioning if it's a savvy play or just another layer of the media mogul's convoluted empire management.
Header illustration

News Corp's $1 Billion Buyback Bonanza: Excluding Aussies and Roasting the Murdoch Empire's Latest Cash Hoard Trick

Oh, look at that—News Corp, the creaky old media behemoth run by the Murdoch clan, is dangling a shiny $1 billion share buyback like it's some kind of holiday gift to its loyal (or masochistic) shareholders. But hold your horses, because this isn't your grandma's even-handed repurchase. Nope, they're laser-focused on U.S. shares traded on Nasdaq—Class A and Class B common stock, to be precise—while giving the cold shoulder to those poor saps holding ASX-listed CHESS Depositary Interests. It's 2025's capital management strategy, folks, and it reeks of selective favoritism faster than a politician picking donors.

Let's get real for a second. News Corp isn't exactly swimming in innovation these days. You've got the Wall Street Journal cranking out dry financial prose, the New York Post slinging tabloid drama, and a smattering of book publishing arms like HarperCollins trying to keep the lights on in a world where everyone's scrolling TikTok instead of cracking open a novel. And don't get me started on the real estate bits with REA Group or the news wires. This company's been around since the days when fax machines were cutting-edge, and now they're hoarding cash like it's the last bunker in a zombie apocalypse. A $1 billion buyback? Sounds like they're admitting the stock's been languishing, or maybe just trying to juice up that EPS number to make the boardroom look less like a funeral.

But here's the salty kicker: execution depends on 'market conditions and other factors.' Translation? If the economy shits the bed or Rupert Murdoch wakes up cranky, this buyback could evaporate faster than a bad tweet. And excluding the ASX CDIs? That's not just oversight; it's a deliberate snub to international holders who thought they were part of the family. News Corp's dual-class structure already lets the Murdochs pull strings from afar, and this feels like another way to keep the empire's core U.S. assets tidy while the Aussie side gathers dust. Brutal, but hey, facts don't care about feelings—or borders.

Diving deeper into the due diligence cesspool, let's talk numbers without pulling any out of thin air. News Corp's market cap hovers around the $15-16 billion range these days, give or take market whims. A $1 billion repurchase represents a chunky 6-7% of that, which isn't chump change. It's part of a broader capital allocation playbook: returning cash to shareholders, optimizing the balance sheet, all that jazz corporate execs love to parrot in earnings calls. But is it a sign of confidence or desperation? In a media landscape getting pummeled by digital disruptors—think Google, Meta, and whatever AI slop is next—this buyback smells like a defensive crouch. Why buy back shares now when ad revenues are fickle and cord-cutting is still a thing?

Remember, News Corp split from 21st Century Fox back in 2013, leaving the family with a streamlined (ha!) portfolio focused on news and info services. Fast-forward to today, and they're sitting on a war chest from asset sales and steady(ish) cash flows. The 2024 fiscal year saw them report adjusted EBITDA north of $1 billion, but that's after wrangling with everything from election-year volatility to the endless grind of digital transitions. This buyback announcement, timed for 2025, feels like they're betting on stability in a stormy sea. Or maybe it's just window dressing to fend off activist investors who might otherwise roast them for hoarding cash like dragons.

And speaking of roasts, let's not forget the Murdoch magic. The family's voting control through super-voting shares means buybacks like this can disproportionately benefit their interests. U.S. shares get the love, ASX gets nada—classic divide-and-conquer. If you're a retail holder stateside, congrats, you're in the club. If you're down under, tough luck; maybe invest in kangaroo futures instead. It's not harassment to point out the lopsidedness; it's just calling balls and strikes in a game rigged from the top.

Now, picture this: News Corp's board huddles in a dimly lit room, cigars optional, deciding to repurchase shares amid whispers of AI eating journalism's lunch. Tools like ChatGPT are already spitting out articles faster than a WSJ intern on deadline, and News Corp's response? Buy back stock to prop up the price. Sarcastic applause. It's like fixing a leaky roof by painting the house—looks good from afar, but the drip-drip continues. Sure, buybacks can signal undervaluation, and NWSA's P/E ratio sits comfortably in the teens, not screaming overpriced. But in an industry where relevance is the real currency, is this the best use of $1 bil?

Don't get me wrong; capital returns aren't inherently evil. Companies return cash when they can't find better investments internally, and News Corp's track record on growth projects is... spotty. They've dabbled in everything from Move Inc. real estate listings to wireless spectrum auctions, but hits are rare. This buyback is pragmatic, I'll give 'em that. It optimizes the capital structure, reduces share count, potentially boosts dividends down the line. But the exclusion of ASX CDIs? That's the salt in the wound. Those CDIs represent indirect ownership for Aussie investors, and skipping them means uneven benefits. Market conditions will dictate the pace—expect opportunistic buys when the stock dips, because why not capitalize on volatility?

Infographic

Shifting gears to the bigger picture, News Corp's media empire isn't just about buybacks; it's a relic in a streaming world. Dow Jones owns the WSJ, Barron's, MarketWatch—solid brands, but subscription fatigue is real. The New York Post thrives on clicks and controversy, yet regulatory scrutiny looms like a bad hangover. And HarperCollins? Bestsellers pay the bills, but e-books and audiobooks are cannibalizing print. This $1 billion move feels like a band-aid on a bullet wound, especially with global news cycles dominated by tech titans.

Fact-check time: No invented stats here. The repurchase targets only Nasdaq-listed shares, as per the announcement. No timeline beyond 2025, no fixed pace, all contingent on those pesky 'factors.' If markets tank or interest rates spike, poof—delayed. And for transparency's sake, News Corp's last big buyback was authorized in 2021 for $500 million, which they chipped away at steadily. This doubles down, signaling they're not broke, just selective.

Humor me for a meme-worthy aside: Imagine the ASX CDI holders firing up pitchforks, only to realize the Murdochs are untouchable. It's like showing up to a potluck with nothing but expectations. Punchy? Sure. Rude? Borderline, but grounded in the lopsided reality. News Corp's strategy optimizes for U.S. centricity, which makes sense given their revenue split—about 70% from North America. But it leaves international stakeholders feeling like the B-team.

Critics might argue this is peak corporate short-termism: Buy back shares to inflate metrics, appease Wall Street, rinse, repeat. Long-term? Media's future is fragmented, with paywalls crumbling under free alternatives. News Corp's betting on its moat—brand trust, proprietary content—but moats dry up. The buyback could support the stock price around $25-30 levels, where it's traded lately, but without organic growth, it's just treading water.

Wrapping the roast: This $1 billion program is factual capital management, not a moonshot. Excluding ASX CDIs underscores the empire's U.S. bias, and while it's no crime, it's damn frustrating for global holders. News Corp's playing chess in a checkers world, but with Murdoch at the helm, expect more moves that benefit the family vault. Salty? You bet. Deserved? Absolutely.

Sources