OPINION • 2026-04-09

EQH-P-A: Yahoo's Broken Forecast Page Says It All – A Salty Dive into This Perpetual Preferred Mess

In this opinion piece, we roast Equitable Holdings' Series A preferred stock (EQH-P-A) with maximum salt, triggered by Yahoo Finance's hilariously broken forecast page. Factual due diligence reveals a stodgy insurance play that's about as exciting as watching paint dry – and twice as unreliable when even the data won't load.
Header illustration

EQH-P-A: Yahoo's Broken Forecast Page Says It All – A Salty Dive into This Perpetual Preferred Mess

Oh, for fuck's sake, retail warriors – you really thought EQH-P-A was gonna be your golden goose? This 6.50% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock from Equitable Holdings Inc. sounds like the lovechild of a bond and a bad blind date: promising stability but delivering endless headaches. And get this – even Yahoo Finance can't scrape together a proper forecast without throwing an 'Oops, something went wrong' tantrum. If that's not a red flag waving in your face like a matador's cape, I don't know what is. Buckle up for some due diligence that's saltier than a margarita rimmed with your tears.

Let's start with the obvious clusterfuck: that Yahoo Finance page for EQH stock forecasts. You click in, expecting charts, analyst ratings, the whole shebang – and bam! 'Error in retrieving data.' It's like the site's allergic to actual information. Navigation links? Sure. Boilerplate crap? Plenty. But the meat? MIA. This isn't just sloppy; it's a metaphor for EQH-P-A itself – a security that's supposed to pay you reliably, but good luck getting straight answers on its future.

Equitable Holdings, for the uninitiated, is one of those insurance behemoths that's been shuffling around like a zombie since spinning off from AXA back in 2018. They deal in annuities, life insurance, and all that actuarial jazz – basically, betting on how long you'll live while charging you premiums to pretend they care. EQH-P-A, issued in 2021, is their Series A preferred: non-cumulative (meaning if they skip dividends, tough shit, you don't get back pay), perpetual (no maturity date, so you're stuck forever unless they call it), and floating rate after 2026. Current yield? Around 6.5% fixed until then, but who knows what happens when it flips. It's traded on NYSE, last I checked hovering in the $24-25 range, but don't quote me – because apparently, even Yahoo can't load the deets.

Now, don't get me wrong; preferred stocks like this are for the grandma in your portfolio who wants steady income without the stock market rollercoaster. But EQH-P-A? It's got that whiff of 'too good to be true' in a rising rate world. Insurance companies love issuing these because they count as Tier 1 capital, padding their balance sheets while you hold the bag. And non-cumulative? That's code for 'we might ghost your dividends if shit hits the fan.' Remember 2008? Preferreds got wrecked. Equitable's got a decent balance sheet – assets over $200 billion, per their filings – but in a recession, insurers are the first to tighten belts.

Here's where the salt really pours: trying to do due diligence on this thing feels like wrestling a greased pig. Public info is there if you dig – SEC filings show EQH's been chugging along with revenue around $10 billion annually, profits in the hundreds of millions. But forecasts? Analysts are mum or contradictory. Some say hold steady; others whisper about interest rate risks eating into that juicy yield. And Yahoo's page? It's like they forgot to pay the server bill. If a major finance site can't load basic data, what does that say about the stock's visibility? Or worse, investor interest? This ain't Tesla; it's not grabbing headlines. It's the wallflower at the prom, promising a dance but stepping on your toes.

Picture this: you're a yield chaser, sick of zero-percent savings accounts, eyeing EQH-P-A for that 6.5% payout. Sounds sweet, right? Quarterly dividends, tax-advantaged for some. But perpetual means no endgame – you're in it for the long haul, or until Equitable decides to redeem at $25 par. They can call it after 2026 if rates drop, screwing your yield, or let it float higher if rates spike, but who trusts insurers to play fair? Their CEO, Lev Lindner, talks a big game about growth in wealth management, but results? Modest at best. Q2 2023 earnings? Beat expectations slightly, but stock barely budged. Yawn.

And let's not ignore the macro salt shaker: interest rates. The Fed's been jerking everyone around, and preferreds like EQH-P-A get hammered when yields rise. Price dips, but that yield climbs – until it floats and potentially tanks your income. Equitable's exposure to real estate and mortgages? Not catastrophic, but in a housing slump, it's another worry. They've got $70 billion in separate accounts, diversified, sure, but diversification is just a fancy word for 'spread out the pain.' If markets sour, your preferred payout might be the only thing keeping you afloat – or not, thanks to non-cumulative BS.

Infographic

Halfway through this roast, and I'm already exhausted. But hey, that's EQH-P-A in a nutshell: exhausting to analyze, exhausting to hold. Now, for the real kicker – why bother? If you're chasing yield, look elsewhere. Treasuries are boring but safe; junk bonds are spicy but risky. This preferred? It's the middle child: ignored, underappreciated, and prone to family drama. Equitable's got a market cap north of $10 billion, solid Moody's rating (A3 or whatever the latest is), but no fireworks. Their investor relations page is a snoozefest of PDFs and earnings calls where execs drone about 'adjusted operating earnings.' Adjusted? Yeah, adjusted to make it look better, probably.

Sarcasm aside, the broken Yahoo page is the cherry on this shit sundae. It's 2023, folks – how does a top finance site fail to load a basic report? The URL points to some Argus quantitative thing, but all you get is errors. Maybe it's paywalled, maybe it's glitchy, maybe nobody cares enough to fix it. For EQH-P-A holders, this opacity is criminal. You deserve better than 'something went wrong' when betting your nest egg. It's like buying a car without a test drive – sure, it might run, but what if the engine's a lemon?

Dig deeper, and Equitable's history is a mixed bag. Post-spin-off, they've acquired things like AllianceBernstein for asset management boost, but integration? Slow as molasses. Preferred stock issuance helped raise capital without diluting common shares – smart for them, meh for you. Dividends have been paid on time so far, no skips, but that's like saying your ex hasn't cheated yet. Past performance? Not a guarantee, especially with non-cumulative hanging over your head.

In a world of meme stocks and crypto chaos, EQH-P-A is the adult in the room – but the kind that lectures you while stealing your beer. It's factual: low volatility, decent coverage ratios (earnings cover dividends 2-3x usually), but boring as hell. No growth story, just steady Eddie insurance. If rates peak and fall, it might shine; if not, you're floating into uncertainty. And with Yahoo's forecast flop, even the pros can't give you a straight answer. Salty? You bet. But that's the due diligence: approach with eyes wide open, or don't approach at all.

Word to the wise: this ain't get-rich-quick. It's get-by-slowly, with a side of aggravation. Equitable Holdings is fine, I guess – no Enron vibes – but EQH-P-A? It's the preferred stock equivalent of settling for vanilla ice cream. Tasty enough, but leaves you wanting sprinkles.

Sources

Get Arena & strategy updates
No spam. Capture-only list (double opt-in coming later).